The Dems "Go Green"

From Mike's America

WAPO Does Not (Linky) Luv Vets For Freedom

This is a screen shot of the Sept. 18, 2008 Wapo story that actually reports about a study that shows "the one" has run more negative advertising than the Maverick; 77% vs. 56% in fact.



I was a bit surprised to see this and was going to grudgingly give them some credit. However, that credit was completely lost and then some when I noticed this little bit in the last paragraph. Mr. Kurtz brings up the 527s and mentions that up until now, there has been scant interest group advertising, only 4. He then lists them; 3 pro-"the one," 1 McCain. See next screen shot.



Notice how the only one not hyperlinked is Vets For Freedom?

It's not like a reporter has to wade through a bunch of Google search results to get their URL.

More non-linky luv at Jawa.

Does plausible deniability explain away patterns?

Did Obama Write His Own Book?

Given the paucity of published material by "The One," it would not seem to be an unreasonable question.

A theory from Jack Cashill...via Vox Popoli

4 TIMES SENATOR

Your own words....page 32

Lookin For Biden Photoshops?

Sobek's gotum

That crafty croc is back (well, kinda) and he's bringing on the funny!

MMMMMM...K thru 12

Guidelines
for Comprehensive
Sexuality Education ....page 25

.

.

Byron York has a pretty in depth analysis of the whole “...rancid, race-baiting ad based on [a] lie. Willie Horton looks mild by comparison” meme.

It appears that the ad was (g)spot-on.

Change You Can Line Your Pockets With

That's pretty good for not even a full first term Senator!

Via LGF

.

.

.

.

.

.

Yeah, Yeah, I know: